Sunday, February 28, 2010

Dependent on Being Independent

After stumbling back to the bar in a drunken stupor, I realized that I'd returned empty-handed. Where was my iPhone? I pushed through the congregated masses and side-shuffled into the sparse areas of the bar to make my way back to the restroom. No iPhone in sight. No iPhone in sight!

I've been without my iPhone for approximately twenty hours now. What's my life to become now, without my electronic personal assistant?

People lived perfectly fine without cell phones. People lived perfectly fine without iPhones. Surely I can make it another day while I wait for a replacement, right?

It's silly thinking about how dependent we've become on tiny pieces of technology. The concept and intention behind developing high tech gadgets seems counterintuitive. We use them to make us more independent and efficient, thereby allowing us to better manage our time and make room for much needed R&R. However, our growing efficacy in time management only leads to cramming more activities into our day. I thought high tech gadgets were designed to make life easier.

Our culture breeds longing for overstimulation and instant gratification. Must we preoccupy ourselves every moment of the day? People can't put their phones down for one second. We iPhone users are the absolute worst. I'll sit at dinner with my friends, most of whom have iPhones. We exchange with each other some wonderful conversation, while we each click at our iPhones, of course. And what about those of us who do not own iPhones? They are mocked and berated, those poor iPhone-less fools. It's good that they don't know what they're missing.

I went to the AT&T store today to decipher my options. I'd ordered a replacement online but dreaded the thought of waiting for its arrival, leaving me iPhone-less for two days. "You already ordered the phone online, and it'll be here in two days," the salesperson replied. "It's too late to cancel the order, so if you want to buy a phone today, you'll have to pay the full $599 and just return the shipped phone as soon as it comes in the mail." Jesus Mary Joseph. No iPhone for two whole days? "You can survive without your iPhone for two days, Ma'am. You will be ok!"

Am I up for the challenge of being iPhone-less for a couple of days? I remember a time without iPhones. My first cell phone was Nokia bulky enough to have given someone cauliflower ear had he or she used the phone too long. It came with three features--phone capability, text messaging, and Snake. My parents paid $30 a month for 30 minutes of service. Nonetheless, though it wasn't exactly the monument of technology of its time, it was way better than Zack Morris' massive walkie talkie.

Mourning the loss of a good friend,
Shopgirl.



Friday, February 26, 2010

Even if I don't want it, can I still keep the ring?

Single and ready to mingle. There's no better way to assert your nonexistent relationship status than by declaring it proudly in an overused rhyme. Some of you may have had fond memories using this phrase. For me, it evokes something more like the Ghost of Christmas Past--eighth grade dances, windbreakers, and flared jeans with the tuxedo stripes running down each leg. '90s flashback, anyone?

Not to say that there's anything wrong with being single. (Though people who still say the aforementioned cliche? That's debatable.) Some people are ecstatic about being single, some absolutely loathe it. Such discrepancies lead me to ask the following question: Does one choose to be single or is one single by default?

Let me clarify. I'm often asked the following question:
"Why are you still single?"
It never fails to amuse me. No, I don't think that there's anything particularly wrong with me, if that's what you're thinking. And even if there were something tragically flawed about me, don't you think that I'd lack the insight to acknowledge it? Second, what do you mean by still? Was I supposed to wait for Prince Charming?

A guy friend of mine made the following argument:
It's more socially acceptable for women to stay committed. It's almost like they are expected to stay in relationships. If a woman is single, I assume one of two things--either she's not yet met the right guy or she just got crapped on by another. For guys, it's different. It's as if society permits them to stay single so that they can stay promiscuous. And even if a guy is dating a girl with seemingly great attributes, he might have no qualms about leaving her.
I think he makes an excellent point--men are generally known to be more promiscuous than women. It's a truism that rings too familiarly; society has traditionally encouraged men to pursue numerous sexual partners while it had ostracized women who do nothing else but the same. Hence, women had been expected to remain in monogamous relationships while men were allowed to peruse the shopping aisle.

We came up with the following conclusion: Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? (A novel concept, I know--but we had to stick with the grocery store analogy.) Most would agree with the statement that it's much easier for women to find sexual partners than it is for men. That said, where are these so-called promiscuous men finding their sexual partners, assuming that they're straight? Though it's clear that the double standard on promiscuity between the sexes still stands, societal viewpoints on this topic have become more progressive. (Thanks, Nelly Furtado?) Promiscuous women, at least in Western first-world nations, have become more accepted into societal norms. In this regard, women are relinquishing the upper hand on selecting sexual partners. Because more women are having sex outside the boundaries of a monogamous relationship, men have a broader selection from which to choose from. Whether the man selects the Grade A beef or some ground meat is another story.

So how do the dynamics of gender promiscuity relate back to the question of single by choice or by default? Women can choose to be single and promiscuous. Similarly, a man can settle down and commit when he's met someone he's decided is worthy of his transformation.

Gender roles have become more complicated as women have become more independent and as marriages (or alternatively, long-term relationships) lean closer towards becoming equal partnerships and away from paternalistic dependencies. The next questions, then are these--what's to happen to our gender roles as we redefine what's acceptable and what's not? Do we progress closer to gender equality or will we suddenly turn the opposite direction?

A former tomboy,
Shopgirl.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Horoscopes are suggested to give purpose in life

Today's Aquarius horoscope for the day states the following:
Today your best friend could call you and say that they've met someone truly amazing who has convinced them to go on a journey. This will inspire you to get going on finding your own special someone. Use your friend's example to be daring and adventurous!
While I can't say that I buy into horoscopes, they're fun to read. (My mother's Roman Catholic opinion? Blasphemy and devil worship.) Two comments on this reading:

1. My best girlfriend's new relationship has definitely inspired me to change my outlook on love. I've not seen two people so unconditionally honest and accepting of each other, respectful of each other's differences without the suffocation or intrusion. I look at their relationship and think, hm, that's what I want for myself--when I'm ready.

2. By stating that I'll be inspired to find my own special someone, the horoscope already assumes that I'm single. Lucky guess. However, surely not all Aquarians are single, right?

To justify the validity of astrology, I needed some hard facts. I'm a scientist by nature and training and need data. After a tedious one minute of Google searching, I found the following compatibility data from www.compatible-astrology.com:


As depicted in the figure above, the higher the numerical value (maximum of 5 and minimum of 1), the greater the compatibility in the area of love specified. That said, the greatest amount of compatibility between Aquarians and other astrological signs occurs when the ratings for Sex, Communication, and overall Compatibility total to 15 points. Comparison of these data suggests that I am significantly most compatible with Geminis, Libras, and Sagittarians (p < 0.5). Noteworthy astrological signs that I might communicate well with but not fully enjoy are Aries and other Aquarians. Signs that the stars propose I steer clear from are Tauruses, Cancers, Capricorns, and Pisces. In addition, telephone numbers that I should keep but only call in times of distress belong to Leos.

These assertions may undergo further testing by conducting field research in locations found to have heavy traffic of eligible males. According to All Women Stalk, the top five places to encounter large sample sizes are at the bar, the market, online, church, and the water cooler. Future studies may involve the validity of the locations indicated, based on the quality of samples found at each location.

Reporting only the hardcore facts and evidence,
Shopgirl.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Bromance, Not Growmance?

Ok, so it's a lame title. But 'tis definitely a question of the times. I can guarantee you that every young woman has pondered variations of the following two questions:

1. What's up with the bromance? and
2. Where do I fit into the bromance equation?

Men, before you jump on me with answers that sound something like "uh" and "duh," can you let me try to answer these?

Let's start with question number two. Ladies, it's a bromance for a reason. That would imply that the following is true: bro + romance = bromance. Stating the obvious? That's because it is. Bromances can only occur between bros and must, absolutely must, exclude the uterus-bearing sex at all times. Men need their time to talk about sports, current events, exploits of sorts, not to mention time to grunt, scratch balls, and slap male booty indiscriminately. The reason why we women cannot and should not participate in this totally hetero tango is because men still need the time to be themselves. As much as you want to believe that you are all that your man needs, you know damn well that you're lying to yourself. Give each other some space and know that you're doing the right thing.

The answer to that question may seem obvious, but I see friends struggle through this issue all the time. For example, how about a true story? Here's a young couple, in love and in a perpetual honeymoon state. They rarely make separate appearances and even go to the restroom together. Um, ick? Space is important, especially regarding matters of the toilet. Albeit, this example is certainly an extreme case. The moral of the story is that participants in couples should have their own lives, own friends, own hobbies, not to mention their own toilet schedules.

So what's the remedy? Ladies--continue having your ladies' nights. Gentlemen--continue having boys' nights out. Staying connected at the hip is a sure way of suffocating each other and potentially driving each other away.

Onward to question numero uno. This one I find to be tough and impossible to answer. Throughout time, famous bromances have allowed us to redefine what kind of relationships are appropriate between completely heterosexual males. We all have an idea what a bromance is and how it looks like, but maybe the best means of describing it is better left to mentioning noteworthy examples. Here are a few of them--Sherlock Holmes and Dr. John Watson; Wayne and Garth; Bill and Ted; Notorious B.I.G. and P. Diddy; House and Wilson; and Siegfried and Roy...? Ok, maybe the last one isn't so hetero, but you get the picture.

The reason why I bring this up is because of the strange dynamic between men in these bromances. Men seem completely open to divulging any matter regarding superficial interests but hiss at the thought of sharing feelings and their innermost thoughts at the risk of sounding emo. That's what I don't get--what's wrong with sounding emo with the best of your buds? Isn't that the point of the almighty bromance--to establish a safehaven for each other, where you can be yourself and not worry about being judged?

Take for example a group of men well into their twenties. They discuss sports, politics, work, new cooking techniques, and the like--but fail to ever discuss their relationships with women. Men, what is it that you're afraid of, exactly? Are you afraid of being judged based on who you're dating or pursuing? Or am I missing the picture, and do you purposely omit your dating details for the sake of keeping your romantic relationship sacred, free of insightful comments like "no way my girlfriend would do that" and "that's what she said?" Or rather, is it competition, or fear of competition? And if so, with whom?

Whatever the reason for the bromance-related emotional ambiguity, the end result seems to point to stunting in emotional growth and well-being. Such issues then beg the following question--if we as women can't expect you to connect deeply with each other--nonetheless yourselves--how can we expect you to connect with us at all? I know men well into their 30s still trying to figure this one out.

Men, are we as women then forever doomed to wonder about the kind of emotional baggage and inhibitions you carry with you? Or do things eventually start to click? Please tell me this happens before the age of 30 and that the 30-year-old men I know of are just bozos and completely unrepresentative of your gender. Otherwise, the only men in my life that are going to remain are either one of two things (or both): relatives or gay. Tragic? I know.

Sincerely curious and definitely not male bashing,
Shopgirl.


Sunday, February 21, 2010

Rice Paddies are Responsible for Why that Asian Kid Next to You Always Beat You at Math


I was on a plane going home from Wisconsin and had a chance to finish Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell. It's his third novel, after The Tipping Point and Blink. I read The Tipping Point on a flight to New York late last year and thought I might investigate all the buzz around Outliers on my own.

Now just as a preface, this post will be somewhat lofty. In fact, after reading this post (if you make it), you might conclude that the description lofty is more so a euphemism or wild understatement of sorts. However, I assure you that I have tried my very best to make this post bearable and less apt to make you want to poke your eyes out.

The book portrays exceptionally successful people (professional athletes, Bill Gates, The Beatles, and of course, Jews, amongst others) and all the factors that contribute to their successes. It touches upon the importance of IQ, birth dates, historical context, cultural upbringing, and pure luck, and how the aforementioned intermingle to create the outliers of society--that is, the megamoguls we know too well and are so envious of.

If you ever read The Tipping Point, you aren't missing too much if you have yet to read Outliers. The two are very similar, as both echo the same theme--all the little things count and contribute to the overall grand picture. The biggest differences between the books are the historical contexts he chooses to wrap each book around. Most times, they were absolutely necessary to convey his point; others were longer than the time it takes to divide a dinner bill into twenty separate checks. Nonetheless, I found his socio-historical lessons refreshing (though sometimes far-fetched) and entertaining. His personal anecdote in the last chapter was a poignant means of drawing all of his points together and added sincerity to the mix.

So is it a yay or nay when considering it as an addition to your already insurmountable reading list? If you've got the leisure, then yes. If not, buy the Cliff Notes version.

Now back to the rice paddies and math connection.

As you may or may not know, I am of Filipino, Chinese, Spanish, and maybe Italian descent. (I like to call myself a product of colonialism.) I was raised under a primarily Filipino-Chinese background, which most would venture to say qualifies me as an Asian American. Growing up Asian American affords me the luxury of being well-versed in Kung Fu and ping pong. I have competed in and won every academic decathalon since grade school and will probably become a scientist, engineer, nurse, doctor, or all of the above. On the downside, my chinky eyes inhibit my ability to see, which is probably why I drive so poorly. In addition, your pet disappearing wasn't just an accident--I was cultivating the rice paddy in my backyard and grew too tired to buy peking duck from the Ranch 99 supermarket, so I caught your pet and ate it for dinner.

Such are the Asian stereotypes that we all grow to know and love. Just to debunk a few--I don't eat domestic pets, I've never competed in academic decathalons because I was too busy winning spelling bees, I've had only four minor car accidents, and I don't know Kung Fu or play ping pong--I play badminton.

Ok, maybe I've only confirmed your suspicions of the yellow people. Stereotypes often ring true as they are gross generalized observations of a particular group of people, right? While I can't convince you to dismiss such stereotypes of the yellow man, allow me to allude back to Outliers to offer some kind of explanation as to why Asian Americans are as dorky as they seem.

In Outliers, Gladwell discusses the roles that culture and heritage play in shaping a person or whole group of people. It emphasizes how communities in the modern-day US must be traced back to their respective mother countries to truly understand why a community exhibits the stereotypes that often characterize them.

For instance, why are Asians (Gladwell refers specifically to the South Chinese, Singaporeans, Korean, and Japanese) so good at math? They don't have intellects that have been particularly bred for success in mathematics. Rather, their rice paddy cultivation bred work ethic and stamina into Asian culture, values that were easily handed down from generation to generation (do note that I am simplifying to great extents). Such work ethic permeates many aspects of the Asian lifestyle, making them formidable competitors in academia simply because they work tediously for longer periods of time. To give you some perspective--the average American student is in school 180 days in a year. The average Japanese student? Over 230 days. That gives Japanese students more time to learn and less time to forget. (Education reform, anyone?)

I think back to my own upbringing and all the factors that contribute to what I can only describe as what family and friends have called "my genius" (I'm not, really--and those of you who are near and dear to me have photographic proof of this fallacy). I'm not a genius at anything--I just happen to be in love with the world and like to busy myself every moment of the day. I'm a huge believer in personal improvement, and I'm ultra-competitive with others and even more so, myself. I even scare other Asians with how competitive I am. To give you some insight on why I am such a psychopathic competitor, let me share a bit about my upbringing. (Told you this was going to be long. You deserve a prize if you've made it this far!)

My maternal grandmother, Felicidad Adriano, was one of maybe six to eight children born to Marciana Damian and Pedro Adriano. They were from the probinsiya--the provinces--of the Philippines. Felicidad, or Fely, as others called her, happened to have a beautifully smooth, light complexion.

Ty Eng Po was an entrepreneur from South China and migrated to the Philippines to set up a number of businesses. He met Fely in passing as she was selling snacks roadside. He immediately took to her and informally married her as his third wife. They had six children, my mom being the second born. As Chinese Filipinos, all of my grandparents' children were afforded advantages in being mixed Filipinos--i.e. higher socioeconomic status in a highly striated and segregated Pilipino society and equally important--access to higher education.

All six children were college educated, and all children, with the exception of my mom and her older sister, attended Chinese school to learn Mandarin. They grew up to become accountants, dentists, doctors, business owners, and computer engineers.

The Philippines was in bad and is even in worse shape today. Beginning in the 1980s, all of them, except for one, left the Philippines and moved to either Australia or the United States. My mom was the only one to move to the US.

My mom always had a knack for opportunity. By 1991, my mother took out her life savings of $4000 and whatever she was able to cash out from my education bonds. She bought plane tickets to LAX, and flew us to California on February 25, 1991. That same year in July, my mom remarried her childhood friend Romy, who had been living in the US since 1986 and had since then become a US Citizen from the amnesty that opened up.

I enrolled in a public elementary school in Downtown Los Angeles as a kindergarten student, despite my already having completed kindergarten in the Philippines the previous year. As a consequence of having been in kindergarten a second time and being in preschool before then, I excelled above my classmates, despite my sometimes unsatisfactory citizenship for excessive chattiness. (I'm so not chatty.) The following year, our then family of four moved to Orange County in fear of the rioting and looting going on in downtown after the Rodney King beating.

My parents and I practiced our English at home to improve our fluencies. After I was able to break away from English Language Development classes, I was tested as a gifted student and was transferred into the Gifted and Talented Education program within the Garden Grove Unified School District of Orange County. I never looked back.

I think about my two younger brothers, who I'll affectionately describe as my complete opposites. Let's think about the historical context: I grew up during my parents' struggle to make ends meet--when McDonald's was a luxury and my babysitter was Home Alone on repeat. My brothers are growing up in a more affluent point in my family's history--we live in a two-story, four bedroom/three bathroom ranch home in a gated community. My parents drive luxury cars--heck, I even drive a luxury car. When I was building forts out of blankets and furniture and creating my own games to keep myself busy, my brothers play PlayStation 3 on their flatscreen HDTV.

It's funny what we learn from our parents, what we internalize from them, and who we become as a consequence of them. Am I competitive and diligent? You bet! If you've ever seen my parents clean the house, you'd think that the Obamas were going to visit. It only seems natural that I would internalize their diligence in maintaining cleanliness and apply it in every aspect of my life. Am I fearless? Completely, with the exception of zombies. Years of facing my mother's stink-eye glare has prepared me for nuclear fallout. Do I consider myself successful? Absolutely. My parents dug our family out of a dingy studio apartment in Downtown LA to a spacey Orange County home in just ten years. They set the standard of achievement for me, which I took upon myself as a signal to carry the torch.

I can't give credit to just my parents alone though. As people, we shape ourselves through the various experiences we encounter. However, it's incorrect to think that who we seem to become are just our individual experiences. We stand on the shoulders of our parents, grandparents, mentors, and teachers (thanks, Mrs. Winders!). Throw all of that in with specific socio-historical settings (thanks, 1986 amnesty and Rodney King riots...?), and you've got yourself an individual human being.

Bah, I think I'm all tapped out and my bladder is full from excessive amounts of coffee I've managed to consume while typing. If you made it this far, congratulations--I owe you a drink.

Eternally grateful to the world and coffee for continuing to fuel my pursuits,
Shopgirl.


Monday, February 15, 2010

Valentine's Day for Single People

So goes another Valentine's Day--or as I have decided to call it (in accordance with all of the other single people out there)--Single Awareness Day!

I celebrated my SAD (um, purely coincidental, by the way) with wonderful friends in Santa Barbara. We drove up there Saturday morning to claim a camp site and proceeded to a 5-mile hike up a luscious green mountain. Here are some pictures from the trip:





Though this was my first Valentine's Day officially celebrated as a SAD, I must say that this was probably the most enjoyable February 14th I've ever had. Didn't have to plan any extravagant event or buy a series of presents to showcase my undying love. It was simple, quiet, and relaxing (except for the couple that was escorted off the camp site for domestic dispute).

Being single isn't as pitiful as I imagined it to be. In fact--I feel empowered being single! So when former suitors are surprised about my not having a date for Valentine's Day, I justly respond, "No, I did not have a date, Sir. And I am completely satisfied with that!"

Ok, I'm exaggerating. But I'm digging this single thing. The freedom rewards me with time to do all the things that I love but have had trouble prioritizing--i.e. reading, practicing music, running, writing silly blogs, etc. Not to mention, the freedom rewards me with time to spend on myself. Hooray for personal improvement?

Always looking up,
Shopgirl.

Sunday, February 14, 2010


2010 The year of the metal tiger

First off, it's the lunar new year so happy new year everyone! I say lunar new year because it's supposed to be the politically correct term since it isn't celebrated solely by the Chinese. It's a subject of debate for some but I don't really care to be picky on semantics. As long as people get the idea, then is it really that big of a deal? Call it what you will and move on to focusing on the more important aspects of the holiday.

It's the year of the tiger which is my lunar animal year. I was born as a fire tiger. What this means? I'm not entirely clear on it so I'll leave it up to you to look up. This is my favorite holiday by far. Not because I receive little red envelopes of Li Xi with money in them (well maybe partly because of that) but because it's so festive compared to all of the holidays. I love everything about it from the flower markets to the food to the T
ết festival. Hell, I even like the music and I'm not one who is keen on listening to Vietnamese music.Too bad I didn't have time to go to the Tết festival this year. I missed out on all of the delicious food **depressed**. If you know me then you know how much I appreciate good food so this was a bit of a bummer for me.


Wasted free Tết festival tickets and VIP parking pass


My haul this year. Not as good as last year's but I guess I'm getting older now so I'm not supposed to be getting these anymore. I thought you're only considered too old once you're married. If that's the case then I should be getting these for at least 4 or 5 more years lest I somehow wind up married sooner than that.

Although I was not able to attend the Tết festival, I made up for it by ringing in the new year with my entire extended family at my grandparent's house. Six loud and crazy uncles challenging each other to drink their livers out. How could I not have fun? I'm happy that the family can still manage to come together even with our chaotic bustling lives and separate families. We all get together for the sake of my grandparents but hopefully it can still be like this for many years to come even once my grandparents pass. After all, my grandpa is already 91. I don't know how much time we have left but I'll take what I can get.

It's hard to think about time and what it really means because we're so engrossed in our lives we just let it pass us by. The more I grow, the more I realize the real importance of time and the power of it's virtue. As stated by the author James Matthew Barrie:


"You must have been warned against letting the golden hours slip by; but some of them are golden only because we let them slip by"

The gift of time is something that many people throw away carelessly without even an afterthought. Time is not something that can be gained and definitely can never be retrieved once lost. Many will come to realize this the hard way. Take care to remember the preciousness of time.

Wishing you a happy and prosperous new year,
WideEyedWonderer

Thursday, February 11, 2010

On WideEyedWonderer




I'm a 23 year old student with too many random thoughts and a mild case of middle child syndrome. Now I've got somewhere that I can unleash my thoughts upon anyone who's curiosity I've piqued.


On a daily basis:

I'm still working towards a career so I'm not yet established which makes my life all the more hectic. I don't have a "daily grind" that most people with regular 9 to 6 jobs do. My schedule is highly unpredictable since I have school and a job in which I literally can be scheduled at any time of the day or night, any day of the week including Saturdays and Sundays, and sometimes even in any city I'm needed to work in. Working full time and being a student full time is awfully time consuming and very taxing but I choose to do it because I honestly don't know what I'd do with myself if I had more free time. I prefer to keep busy rather than lazing around doing nothing.

In my free time:


Don't let my tight schedule fool you. I do have a couple hours out of a day to at least enjoy a nice meal or go exploring in areas that I haven't been before. Whenever I find myself without any attendance obligations I generally grace myself with the company of my friends and family. I mostly like to hang out at my grandparent's house to make sure that they're happy and feeling healthy. All the gossip between my grandma and myself is a plus too. The rest of the time I am probably shopping or having lunch/dinner with my sister or my friends. These are the most precious minutes that I spend in a day.

I'm a highly social creature so I'm not there so much for the food but more for the conversation and general banter exchanged between myself and whoever is opposite me. The topics are usually not serious and sometimes it's complete nonsense and everyone is just fooling around. Regardless of what is being discussed, I'm pleased as long as everyone is happy and having a good time. I believe the most important things in life are the beautiful and joyous times you have shared with someone. **More on this in another entry**

Personnalité and Mannerisms:

I've been described as a "firecracker." I can only assume what that connotes. Am I really that lively? I guess I can see where that came from but I'm generally mild mannered. Yes sometimes I'm loud, but I think that stems from being in an Asian family. You have to talk louder than the next person otherwise you will not be heard; although I believe I'm really only loud if I'm happy and excited about what I'm trying to say. I also have to be really comfortable with someone to be like that so if you think I'm loud, it's because you are one of few who are near and dear to me.

I pretty much get along with everyone and it really takes a lot before I even have an inkling of going apeshit on someone. Sure I've made grown men cry, had people fired, hurled people completely out of my life and considered them dead, etc. but such things only occur on rare occasion. Some people just have bad characters and I'd rather not have trash like that cluttering up my life and making me miserable.

I don't like people who are fake, egotistic, or unfair. Liars also don't fly in my book. It's one thing to not want people to know every little thing about you but straight up lying is plain unsavory. I give people plenty of room for redemption if they so choose to accept it and nullify the consequences of their trespasses against me. If you can fall in between these lines then we'll have no problem. If you can't and you cross me, you should just run and hide. I'm a downright tiger ready to tear some shreds. I'll either send someone for you or go after you myself.

These are just some of the principles that I feel I will forever uphold in this lifetime. As for the rest of my life.. it's too soon to tell which step I will fall in tune with. I will just have to settle with going wherever the wind blows.

Moving along with swagger,
WideEyedWonderer

Monday, February 8, 2010

The Emergence of the 30-year-old Virgin

A good girlfriend of mine is dating a man who I can only describe as a 30-year-old virgin. Don't let his title fool you--he is an intelligent and charming fellow who seems fully capable of bedding a woman. And yet, he has chosen to wait for sex until marriage.

Commendable? Of course. Bizarre? Absolutely. Nowadays, voluntary asexuality is perceived as either a myth or consequence of denial. It's like Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and fat-free, zero-guilt dessert. We all hope and want such things to exist though more often than not admit that none of the above could ever possibly just be.

The question now is--why? I don't know many women who are still virgins, so why should I expect the infamously more promiscuous sex to differ?

As we grow up, we're socialized into gender roles and the types of behaviors that we're expected to exhibit. While men learn to become the pursuers, women learn to become the pursued. (Yes, I'm generalizing.) In high school, boys discuss which girls they are going to ask to the Prom, while girls wait anxiously to be asked. (In American society, it's become normal to assume that men have become the aggressive hunters while women assume a more passive role in courtship. Of course, these expectations have changed over time, and these changes have become more transparent over time. Women can mostly agree that we play an integral role in courtship. As in--it's a fallacy to assume that we just lay back and take it!) In our twenties, we hang out at trendy bars and clubs, where young women such as myself can usually expect Mr. Wrongs/Mr. Right-Nows to spit out pick-up lines more stale than their dirty underwear.

So where am I going with this ramble? Women are used to being pursued by men. Empirical evidence suggests that pursuits are usually for sexual advancement. The emergence of the "bro" and the "guido" have only worsened the cause. That said, herein lies the confusion--how can women tell if a man is sincerely nice or is being nice to get into our chonies?

Guys have a bad rep. Even nice guys have a bad rep, by virtue of their gender. So men, how do you overcome the growing cynicism directed towards you from the fairer, lovelier sex? And women, how do we learn to trust our chivalrous counterparts?

Looking forward to Single Awareness Day 2010,
Shopgirl.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

On Shopgirl

I'm 23 years old, going on 24 next week. I'm officially entering my mid-twenties.

Things I have done in my life that I am particularly proud of:
1. I have a career (be it short-term) that I enjoy and draw personal fulfillment from.
2. I am going back to school to pursue a dream that seemed so distant only a year ago.
3. My overbearing, conservative parents no longer think I have intentions to jeopardize my future. I might venture to say that they are even proud of me.
4. I have all the friends I've ever wanted or needed, despite my emotionally-detached and unintentional aloof demeanor.
5. I don't feel the need to prove anything to anyone.

Things I have done in my life that make me cringe:
1. New Year's Eve 2010.
2. My fashion sense, circa 1998.
3. Captain Morgan shots I can't say I have the pleasure of remembering, 22nd birthday.
4. Hot Cheetos + Grey Goose Vodka.

I declare 2010 to be the year of reflection and personal growth. It seems to be an ongoing theme for many 20-somethings this year. Do you agree? That being said, I feel it's important to discuss where I've been and where I am now to explain what I mean.

Where I was last year: First year high school teacher in South Central Los Angeles, full-time student to get my post-bac teacher credential. (Enough said.) I was probably planning Valentine's Day with my boyfriend at the time. We'd been together on-and-off (mostly on) for almost six years then, all throughout my senior year in high school and all four years in college.

Where I've been lately: My boyfriend and I ended our relationship six months ago. Suddenly, I felt like a domesticated animal released from captivity and into the wild. Single life in my twenties? Couldn't understand it but saw the need to catch up with everyone else who'd been wingin' it so long. It's like everyone spoke "single people code," a dialect rich with dating rules and implied gender roles that I'd apparently missed the memo on during my six-year sabbatical.

Where I am now: Redefining my "gray area self." I know how I am when committed to a relationship. On the other hand, I've seen how cutesy (and not to mention terrible) I can be when I'm on a mission to get what I want from whomever I want. Seeing both extremes, I'm ready to get back to who I am and who I want to become in the next few years. That is--confident? Yes. Bitchy? Only when warranted. Scratch that--assertive! Less delusional? Only when necessary. Lifelong learner and dreamer? Always!

My M.O. for this year? Daily deep and meaningful reflection. Accomplish personal goals, TBA. Get the idea out of my head that wearing a size zero is completely normal and is the only size I should be wearing. Lastly, have a fabulous hair day, everyday.

On a revolution,
Shopgirl.